The apostrophe, again?

BBC4 started a new series about the quirks and idiosyncracies of the English language tonight, and with no hint of a surprise, the apostrophe featured in one of the first quandaries for the panel.

I'm wondering if their answer was right, but I admit the point that was raised isn't one I'd come across before, so I just don't know.

The reference was to the dotting of is and crossing of ts. According to the question-master, the correct format is to refer to the dotting of I's and the crossing of T's.

My problems:

  • Capital I doesn't have a dot.
  • The I's and T's are plurals aren't they? That means no apostrophe. 
  • But the I's and T's might be possessive of the dots and crosses, so the apostrophe is correct.
  • is and ts look terrible – I's and T's just look right.

Well, thinking about it hasn't helped, but I guess I'll just be going with the flow as it's the most readable and understandable.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: